“Big problem”: The Supreme Court has handcuffed the EPA on climate change. What’s next?

“Big problem”: The Supreme Court has handcuffed the EPA on climate change. What’s next?

“Big problem”: The Supreme Court has handcuffed the EPA on climate change. What’s next?

In a 6-3 ruling on Thursday, a conservative block of the U.S. Supreme Court limited the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to deal with climate change, but the ruling could have broader implications, experts said. ..

The verdict shows the main turning points of the two storylines. A group advancing stronger climate protection measures, scientists warn to stop a series of global disasters, said this decision is the second largest source of such pollutants in the US energy sector. Regulate after transport, saying it hampered the federal government’s ability to curb greenhouse gas emissions from.

“It robs Americans of their ability to help tackle the worst impacts of climate change and their ability to protect the environment and our communities from the growing climate crisis,” said AFGE President. Marie Owenspawell said the EPA’s largest union, Council 238.

Nonprofit human resources consultants say the ruling could have a “massive deterrent effect” on regulators of various federal agencies, from the Ministry of Transport to the Ministry of Energy to the Department of Occupational Safety and Health. Kevin Bell said. Civil servant for organizational environmental responsibility.

“Major regulatory programs with deviations from current practices … We are currently facing a major problem, “Bell predicted.

Details by past and present EPO staff and legal experts from the entire political spectrum are as follows:

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *